8月16日，云南大理鹤庆半程马拉松。
A photo shows WuXi AppTec in the Waigaoqiao Bonded Area of the Shanghai Free Trade Zone. Photo: VCG
A US federal judge on Friday temporarily "barred the Pentagon from including Chinese biotechnology group WuXi AppTec on a list of companies believed to support Beijing's military," according to Reuters. Chinese experts said the ruling sends a positive signal for Chinese companies operating in the US, showing that Washington's arbitrary, fact-deficient national security blacklists are not beyond challenge and that firms should make greater use of legal means to defend their legitimate rights.
US District Judge James Boasberg issued an order blocking enforcement of the designation of WuXi in June after the company filed suit. WuXi in a statement welcomed the court's ruling, saying it "relieves us from the immediate adverse consequences" of the Defense Department's designation during the litigation. "We believe that the facts, as demonstrated in our court filings, will prevail after an objective and fair judicial review," a WuXi spokesperson said, according to the report.
A South China Morning Post report noted that the ruling represents an early legal victory for one of China's largest pharmaceutical research and manufacturing service providers and a setback for Washington's expanding use of national-security restrictions against major Chinese commercial companies.
Gao Lingyun, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that the Pentagon's controversial "list-first, evidence-later" approach has bred massive operational uncertainty for Chinese enterprises conducting legitimate business in the US. By arbitrarily imposing restrictive labels before presenting credible proof, Washington creates an opaque and unpredictable regulatory environment that disrupts normal commercial expectations.
The US Department of Defense released its updated Section 1260H list on June 8, marking the first time WuXi AppTec was formally included, alongside Alibaba, Baidu, BYD and Unitree Robotics, among others.
On June 12, WuXi AppTec announced it had filed suit against the Department of Defense in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. The company said the department's decision was erroneous and lacked factual basis or support under applicable statutes and case law.
He Weiwen, a senior fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, noted that when Chinese companies face unfair and unjustified suppression in the US, they cannot rely solely on corporate statements or diplomatic representations; they must also protect themselves through legal means. Filing suit in federal court is entirely necessary and correct, he said.
"In the past, quite a few Chinese companies had nothing to do with so-called military matters but were hit with US countervailing and anti-dumping measures. Many won their cases after appealing to the Court of International Trade. Legal recourse is an indispensable tool and one we need to take more seriously," he said.
In January 2021, Xiaomi was placed on a similar Pentagon list. The Chinese company later announced on May 26, 2021 that a US court has removed the company's designation as a military-related company and lifted all restrictions on US persons buying or holding its stock, Reuters reported.
The designation has so far had little impact on WuXi AppTec's business. The company reported on August 3 that first-half revenue rose 38.9 percent year-on-year to 28.9 billion yuan, while net profit attributable to shareholders climbed 29.4 percent to 11.08 billion yuan — its first half-year profit above the 10-billion-yuan mark, said media reports.
When asked about US placing several Chinese technology companies including Alibaba, Tencent, BYD, on a list of firms that it says aid China's military, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said that China firmly opposes the US overstretching the concept of national security and formulating various types of discriminatory lists to go after Chinese businesses. "We urge the US to correct its wrongdoings, and stop the unwarranted suppression of Chinese businesses. China will do what is necessary to firmly protect their legitimate and lawful rights and interests," said Lin.
。赛道海拔约2200米，氧气稀薄，就在这样的高原赛道上，焦安静跑出了1小时18分40秒，拿下女子组冠军。焦安静王者归来！无数跑者为之动容。但真正让人触动的，不是这个冠军本身，而是她为了站上这条起跑线，走过的那些路。
B |
从150斤到117斤去年，焦安静遭遇了孕中期胎儿异常的引产手术。身体和心灵的双重打击下，她的体重一度飙到将近150斤。对一个职业跑者来说，这几乎意味着职业生涯的终结。有跑友给她留言说：“没意义了，不可能拿到名次了。
C | ”她没辩解，只是行动起来，一点点往前熬。今年3月，恢复训练的第六天，她才跑了第一个五公里。5月，兰州马拉松，她跑了3小时08分07秒——这是她全马生涯最慢的一次。
D | 但她把这称为“重生的起点”。
E | 6月，昆明半马，1小时27分28秒。7月，她做了一个疯狂的决定——从丽江骑行1370公里，9天翻越海拔5100米的东达山垭口，赶到林芝参加半马。
F | 最终以1小时22分09秒获得女子第四名。8月，鹤庆半马，1小时18分40秒，冠军。从150斤到117斤，从“不可能”到“王者归来”。她用了不到半年时间，把自己重新“跑”了回来。周跑量203公里为了备战鹤庆半马，焦安静那一周的跑量累计到了203公里。
G | 203公里是什么概念？平均每天29公里，也就是连续七天每天跑一个半马。
H | 这绝不是普通人能承受的量，也不该是普通人追求的目标。她是职业跑者，她的身体能扛住这个强度，不代表你的身体也能。别人习以为常的训练量，对普通跑友来说，可能就是过度消耗。
I | 她是在“拼命”，但拼的是职业的命焦安静的故事确实很打动人。焦安静的“拼命”，是职业运动员的本分。
J | 普通跑友的“拼命”，应该是对自己健康的负责。她骑行1370公里去参赛，是因为她想要减肥。她一天三练、周跑量200公里，是为了再次证明自己。她半年减掉三十多斤，是因为有专业的训练计划和饮食方案。你要是连基础代谢都不清楚，就别学人家疯狂减重了。职业选手走的路，是给职业选手走的。普通跑者该走的路，是跑得久、跑得健康。写在最后焦安静的故事确实让人动容。她经历了人生最灰暗的日子，又一步一步爬了回来。她自己说过，是跑步再次拯救了她，给了她重新振作的力气。这种精神值得敬佩，但她的训练强度，不值得盲目模仿。
K | 跑步圈有一种风气——谁跑量大谁厉害，谁练得狠谁有面子。但真正的厉害，不是你跑得多快、堆了多少跑量，而是你能跑多久。
L | 焦安静曾在一篇记录中说过，她希望自己能跑到80岁。她也提到，孕期运动要减量到平时的四分之三左右才安全——她比谁都清楚什么叫“量力而行”。她拼命，是因为跑步是她的饭碗。
M | 你拼命，是为了什么？为了朋友圈的点赞？为了在跑群里被叫一声“大神”？为了配速表上那几秒的进步？如果是，请停下来想一想。跑步的初衷，从来不是把自己跑垮。是跑完之后，还能笑着回家，还能第二天精神抖擞地再出门。跑自己的节奏，跑自己的距离，跑自己的健康。这才是我们每一个普通跑者，最该走的路。
